Policy Watch
The Business Manager Visa Tightened — What It Changes for Acquisition Entrepreneurs
Japan raised the bar for the keiei kanri (Business Manager) residence status. What changed, who it actually affects, and why acquisition-led entry may now be the stronger path.
Key takeaways
- From 16 October 2025, a new Business Manager visa generally requires ¥30 million of capital, at least one full-time employee, Japanese ability, and three years of management experience or a relevant master's degree.
- The change targets paper companies. An operating business is a stronger file than a shell, and it is not an exemption from the new tests.
- Renewals have a transition through 16 October 2028. New grants do not.
For years, the Business Manager (経営・管理) status of residence had a famously accessible floor: a real office, plus either roughly ¥5 million in capital or two full-time employees, and a plausible business plan. That accessibility built a cottage industry of minimal-substance applications. On 16 October 2025 the Immigration Services Agency put a stricter standard into force.
For a new grant, the published tests now generally include ¥30 million of paid-in capital (or ¥30 million invested in the business, for a sole proprietor), at least one full-time employee, Japanese ability around the B2 level held by the applicant or a full-time employee, and either three years of management experience or a relevant master's degree. A qualified professional must also review the business plan. Renewals have a transition through 16 October 2028: an existing status can still be extended, case by case, where the business is healthy, taxes are paid, and the applicant is expected to meet the new standard next time. Individual cases vary — verify the current application of these rules with an immigration specialist before structuring anything. The direction, though, is settled, and it reshapes the calculus for foreign buyers in two ways:
An operating company is a stronger file than a shell, and it is not an exemption. The tightening aims at companies formed to hold a visa rather than to operate. An acquirer of a real succession target arrives with the opposite profile — existing employees, real revenue, tax history, a bank relationship, and a continuity story that can be checked. That substance helps. It does not waive the capital, employee, language, or experience tests on a new grant. "I am the successor to a 35-year-old company with eleven employees" is legible. It still has to be paired with a structure that meets the ordinance.
Capital planning must front-load. If your acquisition budget was already in the tens of millions of yen, the higher capital bar changes sequencing more than feasibility — but structure matters (capital in the visa-sponsoring entity, timing relative to closing, who holds the Japanese ability). This is a design-it-early item, not a post-LOI detail; see the sequencing section of our FEFTA and visas guide.
The wider signal is worth reading correctly. Japan is not closing to foreign business owners — inbound investment promotion remains explicit policy — it is filtering for substance. For serious succession buyers, a higher filter is on balance helpful: it thins the noise that made some owners and advisors wary of foreign counterparties in the first place.